Preserving peri-implant health1

Odds ratios of peri-implantitis nine years after implant placement1

Straumann | 1
Nobel Biocare | 3.7
Astra® Tech Implant System | 3.5
98.3% Nobel Biocare Implants with the TiUnite® surface
96.6% Astra Tech implants with TiOblast® surface
All Straumann TL implants with SLA® surface.
Download study overview

Results from a large retrospective study1 of dental implants in a broad clinical setting with 9 year follow-up, showed that the odds ratio of peri-implantitis 9 years after implant therapy was more than three times lower with Straumann® Soft Tissue Level SLA implants than with Nobel Biocare or AstraTech Implant System implants.

Watch testimonials

Designed to respect the biological distance

  • Implant-abutment interface is moved away from the bone
  • No microgap in the healing-critical zone
Learn more

10 years of clinical data – a long history of success

  • High survival and success rates for the Straumann® Soft Tissue Level Implant System in 10-year studies.2,3
98.8%
Implant survival rate, 10 years2
97.0%
Success rate of Straumann secondary prosthetic components, 10 years3,7

Mean of marginal bone loss (in mm) after 10 years

  • The 10 years prospective clinical data in the edentulous maxilla confirms the high treatment success from both a surgical and restorative perspective of the Soft Tissue Level System.4,6,7
Soft Tissue Level System | -1.07
Standard acceptable bone loss | -2.8
-1.07 Soft Tissue Level System
-2.8 Standard acceptable bone loss (according to Albrektsson et al.)3,6
Mean of marginal bone loss after 10 years in (in mm)

Reduces complexity in your workflow

Built-in smooth neck shapes the soft tissue, thus minimizing the need for time-consuming soft tissue management procedures.

  • One-stage surgery with integrated soft tissue management
  • Restoring with a solid abutment is like restoring a natural tooth preparation.
  • Easy to maintain due to height of the machined collar, with clear access to implant connection, even in the posterior region

A solution for every clinical need

  • Versatile implant options maximize treatment flexibility
    (2.8 and 1.8 mm neck)
  • Wide choice of prosthetic solutions
  • Precise and flexible positioning with the synOcta® connection
  • Original: Perfect fit with original components
Discover your
implant options
Find the right
prosthetic solution
Download Tissue
Level brochure

New impression components

Maximize precision and reliability of your restorations with the new impression components.

  • Implant Level Closed Tray Impression:
    A new level of precision thanks to full metal posts (RN & WN)
  • Make abutment-level impression possible in both open and closed-tray.

Testimonials and results

Dr. French: “…it makes more sense from the peri-implant health perspective…”

Dr. Higginbottom: “…easier than restoring natural teeth …”

Dr. Martin: “… very easy to confirm seating of multiple units …”

Restorations gallery

Lateral incisor
3-Unit Bridge
Cantilever
Hybrid
Central incisor
Central incisor
Premolar

What clinicians say

More details for instruction for use available here
1 Derks J, Schaller D, Hakansson J, Wennstrom JL, Tomasi C, Berglundh T. Effectiveness of Implant Therapy Analyzed in a Swedish Population: Prevalence of Peri-implantitis. J Dent Res. 2016 Jan; 95(1):43-9. (Doctoral thesis reference: ISBN 978-91-628-9491-7).
2 Buser D, Janner SF, Wittneben JG, Brägger U, Ramseier CA, Salvi GE. 10-Year Survival and Success Rates of 511 Titanium Implants with a Sandblasted and Acid-Etched Surface: A Retrospective Study in 303 Partially Edentulous Patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Dec;14(6):839-51.
3 Wittneben JG, Buser D, Salvi GE, Bürgin W, Hicklin S, Brägger U. Complication and failure rates with implant-supported fixed dental prostheses and single crowns: a 10-year retrospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res.2014 Jun;16(3):356-64.
4 The calculation is based on n =388 reevaluated reconstructions (397 original reconstructions – 9 non-prosthetic failures) Wittneben et al.(2014, p. 3 & p. 6). In total there were 13 abutment related complications (10x occlusal screw loosening, 1x occlusal screw fracture, 1x abutment loosening, 1x abutment fracture) Wittneben et al.(2014, p. 5)
5 Fischer K, Stenberg T. Prospective 10-year Cohort Study Based on a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) on Implant-Supported Full-Arch Maxillary Prostheses. Part 1: Sandblasted and Acid-Etched Implants and Mucosal Tissue. Clin Implant Dent Relat Research. 2012 Dec;14(6):808-12.
6 Fischer K, Stenberg T. Prospective 10-year cohort study based on a randomized, controlled clinical trial (RCT) on implant-supported full-arch maxilary prostheses. Part II: Prosthetic outcomes and maintenance. Clin Implant Dent Relat Research. 2013 Aug;15(4):498-508.
7 Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986 Summer;1(1):11-25.
Click edit button to change this code.