Continuity and success inspiring generations

The value of a classic standard is appreciated and shared over generations. It has proven successful innumerable times, gives peace of mind and is constantly refined by passionate people.
A source of
confidence
Be inspired by
new developments
Watch testimonials and
discover use cases

Reliable

Designed to preserve peri-implant health1

Odds ratios of peri-implantitis nine years after implant placement1

Straumann | 1
Nobel Biocare | 3.7
Astra® Tech Implant System | 3.5
98.3% Nobel Biocare Implants with the TiUnite® surface
96.6% Astra Tech implants with TiOblast® surface
All Straumann TL implants with SLA® surface.
Download study overview

A large independent study on peri-implantitis1 demonstrated substantial differences between implant systems and the occurrence of peri-implantitis.

The probability of being diagnosed with peri-implantitis nine years after implant therapy was lowest with the Straumann® Soft Tissue Level SLA implants compared to alternative systems.

Designed to respect the biological distance

  • Implant-abutment interface is moved away from the bone
  • No microgap in the healing-critical zone
Learn more

10 years of clinical data – a long history of success

  • High survival and success rates for the Straumann® Soft Tissue Level Implant System in 10-year retrospective study on partially edentulous patients.2,3
98.8%
Implant survival rate, 10 years2
97.0%
Success rate of Straumann secondary prosthetic components, 10 years3,4

Mean of marginal bone loss (in mm) after 10 years

  • High treatment success rate from both a surgical and restorative perspective 10- years of data from prospective clinical studies using the Straumann® Soft Tissue Level System in the edentulous maxilla.4,5,6
Soft Tissue Level System | -1.07
Standard acceptable bone loss | -2.8
-1.07 Soft Tissue Level System
-2.8 Standard acceptable bone loss (according to Albrektsson et al.)3,5
Mean of marginal bone loss after 10 years in (in mm)

Easy-to-use

Reduces complexity in your workflow

Placement at soft tissue level and the machined 45° collar promotes fast healing of the peri-implant soft tissues.

  • One-stage surgery with integrated soft tissue management
  • Easy to restore. Using the solid abutment is like restoring a natural tooth preparation.
  • Easy to maintain due to height of the machined collar, with clear access to implant connection, even in the posterior region

Versatile

A solution for every clinical need

  • Versatile implant options maximize treatment flexibility
    (2.8 and 1.8 mm neck)
  • Wide choice of prosthetic solutions
  • Precise and flexible positioning with the synOcta® connection
  • Original: Perfect fit with original components
Discover your
implant options
Find the right
prosthetic solution
Download Tissue
Level brochure

Be inspired by new developments

New impression components

Maximize precision and reliability of your restorations with the new impression components.

  • Implant Level Closed Tray Impression:
    A new level of precision thanks to full metal posts (RN & WN)
  • Make abutment-level impression possible in both open and closed-tray.

Testimonials and results

Dr. French: “…it makes more sense from the peri-implant health perspective…”

Dr. Higginbottom: “…easier than restoring natural teeth …”

Dr. Martin: “… very easy to confirm seating of multiple units …”

1 Derks J, Schaller D, Hakansson J, Wennstrom JL, Tomasi C, Berglundh T. Effectiveness of Implant Therapy Analyzed in a Swedish Population: Prevalence of Peri-implantitis. J Dent Res. 2016 Jan; 95(1):43-9. (Doctoral thesis reference: ISBN 978-91-628-9491-7).
2 Buser D, Janner SF, Wittneben JG, Brägger U, Ramseier CA, Salvi GE. 10-Year Survival and Success Rates of 511 Titanium Implants with a Sandblasted and Acid-Etched Surface: A Retrospective Study in 303 Partially Edentulous Patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Dec;14(6):839-51.
3 Wittneben JG, Buser D, Salvi GE, Bürgin W, Hicklin S, Brägger U. Complication and failure rates with implant-supported fixed dental prostheses and single crowns: a 10-year retrospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res.2014 Jun;16(3):356-64.
4 Fischer K, Stenberg T. Prospective 10-year Cohort Study Based on a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) on Implant-Supported Full-Arch Maxillary Prostheses. Part 1: Sandblasted and Acid-Etched Implants and Mucosal Tissue. Clin Implant Dent Relat Research. 2012 Dec;14(6):808-12.
5 Fischer K, Stenberg T. Prospective 10-year cohort study based on a randomized, controlled clinical trial (RCT) on implant-supported full-arch maxilary prostheses. Part II: Prosthetic outcomes and maintenance. Clin Implant Dent Relat Research. 2013 Aug;15(4):498-508.
6 Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term e»cacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986 Summer;1(1):11-25.